Sweet theft
The first day of May and a new “sin tax” hits the lowest paid.
Yes, today is the first day of the sugar tax, or the soda tax or whatever you want to call it. Leastwise the powers that be are going to raid our pockets but it’s all for our own good.
Sin taxes are quite clever when you look at them. First you pick on some imaginary problem, then you convince the plebs that the problem is not only real, but is an “epidemic” or a “threat” or even a “crisis”.
Having convinced [nearly] everyone that the only way to solve this problem is to force people to pay more for it, you sit back and watch the cash roll in. Nobody will object because it is after all “for our own good”.
The fact that these taxes don’t work is paradoxically a good thing. Once the figures are in and there is a demonstrable lack of effect then you simply announce that maybe a hefty rise in the sin tax will work. More money rolls in!
You can argue that if the “problem” is so severe that it should be banned or taxed at several hundred percent, but that will defeat the whole object of the game. If you ban an item then you can’t collect taxes from it. If you levy an exorbitant tax then demand may well drop off but then so does your tax base. In fact if you do levy an exorbitant tax rate then people will simply find methods of circumventing that tax by legal or [more likely] illegal means. The trick is to start small and then build up in salami-slices, so that the 10c tax soon becomes a €1 tax or even a €10 tax – little increments means few complaints.
The first sin tax to be introduced was of course the tobacco tax. When the various powers realised that there was billions to be made out of it they moved on to obesity and alcohol. Obesity is a master stroke as so many things can be fingered as a cause. They can go for sugar, fat, or any number of foodstuffs and simply apply a tax to each one in turn. While the tobacco tax was ignored by the general public as it didn’t affect them, the obesity taxes will eventually apply to everyone. But at this stage they still won’t object because they have been thoroughly brainwashed into the thought that it’s for everyone’s good, and to be against the tax somehow means they are all for obesity or whatever.
A nice sleight of hand is to invent a monster that is trying to devour us all. With tobacco it is of course “Big Tobacco” and now we are into “Big Sugar” and “Big Alcohol”. The fact that such entities don’t exist is irrelevant: it is just sufficient that the public perceives that they exist.
We are all together in fighting that evil empire of Big and if it costs us then we welcome it. Please take my money – it’s to save the population!
So welcome to the world of the soft drink tax.
I can guarantee it is the first of many.
Meanwhiles Scottish nanny has introduced the minimum price for alcohol to solve ‘their epidemic’ and going with the ‘will of the people.
So much for the illusion of democracy.
And in England there are a pair of twats chatting to Parliament about Englands obesity epidemic. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5677261/Jamie-Oliver-child-obesity-LIVE-Celebrity-chefs-call-cheap-healthy-food-Commons.html?ITO=1490
I don’t know how anyone can take that slug seriously. He admits himself that he’s a stone overweight which is a great advertisement and an example to follow. I notice constant references in his speech to “we” and “our children” as if we are all big happy family. I wouldn’t let him within a mile of the Grandkids in case some of his slime transferred. He can fuck off right up his own arse.
Even worse, today Scotland starts Minimum Alcohol Pricing – that’s not even a tax (which might be spent on useful things, but probably not), it just puts extra money into the pockets of the suppliers. Wonder who’s picking up the ‘bungs’ from that?
The minimum price of a bottle of wine becomes £4.88 – you can currently buy many different types from around £2.99 upwards in around 20p steps. Will all those currently under £4.88 now start to £4.88, or will the scale differentiation still apply, thus guaranteeing extra takings from every bottle? It’s madness.
I’m thinking of setting up a booze business with branches in Carlisle and Berwick – anyone out there fancy investing?
How about a potín still? Very easy to make.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/17/35/13/1735135bd448213e6f72cecf6b419c0d.jpg
Grandad,
“We are all together in fighting that evil empire of Big…”
How about we all join together in fighting that evil empire of Big governments?
Big Health. That would include all the healthists and Big Pharma?
Then there is this lunatic asylum funded and sadly I am not kidding, to the tune of 1 billion pounds sterling.
Unfuckingbelievable, but true. And it is not the largest.
https://www.health.org.uk/about-us
There are astronomical sums to be made out of the “public health” racket. One day the public are going to wake up to the scam. Roll on that day…..
Bet they only spend the interest on ‘their work’. Never heard of the fuckers until today.
Fuck me they are not even in the top 10 in Europe!
Admittedly not all healthy ngo’s but the sums involved are indeed colossal.
https://www.fundsforngos.org/article-contributions/top-ten-wealthiest-european-foundations/
Beam me up Scotty.
A bit personal and maybe not fully on topic but…………
Because of my current situation I’ve been looking at funding. I’m disgusted.
Billions go direct from Big Government etc. to their favoured Big Health Friends and I discover that Pancreatic Cancer, ranking 4th in the annual causes of cancer deaths receives only 2% of available funding. The incredibly low survival rates have remained stagnant over the past 40 years. In contrast I have the greatest respect for a small charity(PCRF) I found and intend to support as much as possible. They rely purely on public donations, manage to raise a mere £1 million a year and fund around 8 research projects each year. Despite small money and the risk of personal/professional failure members of these innovative projects have already resulted in at least two major breakthroughs.
For all the so-called progress being made it just goes to show that Big Health will not risk our Big Money on difficult challenges when they can so profitably chase the Big easy headline.
The epidemic meme has gone viral https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DcD-w1BUwAATpA-.jpg
The Obesity Policy Coalition? Jayzus – talk about ganging up on the poor population.
Here’s forty ‘organisations/charities’ full of publicly funded fruit loops banding together to do whatever the fuck they do do. Isn’t there a small island somewhere where they can all be stored to wither away quietly, there must be.
http://obesityhealthalliance.org.uk/members/
Rockall?
More for Rockall. https://foodfoundation.org.uk/about/
Perhaps simply defunding the wankers would work?
I could guess it but would still like to read K8’s take on this nannying stuff seen as she has one leg in the state as paramedic and the other still in plaster, presumably, and repairing well one hopes. Perhaps a guest post worthy of reading?
Plastic next.
They have already had a pogrom of plastics at my works canteen Doonhammer. used to have wee plastic cups I could have a cuppa out of, last week they all disappeared, I asked one of the lovely catering maids WTF was going on – “all we skipped them all” WHY? I asked – “because of the Enviroment or something…” (she didn’t look that convinced either) I shouted “BOLLOCKS” and laughed hearitly. Anyway she was nice enough to supply me with a cardboard takeaway cup with a PLASTIC lid!
So thats about 3 full catering sized boxes of plastic cups that went into landfill to save some little fishes lifes that might gorge on them, what a fucking fiasco!
I hope this doesn’t give any other government any ideas but in Canada our leaders were running out of excuses for why they had to raise the taxes on booze every few years. For our own good of course. They came up with an ingenious solution. In 2017 they introduced a new law that says booze taxes are to go up automatically each and every year on April 1 in line with inflation. Ad infinitum. Needless to say, this current ruling Liberal Party doesn’t stand a chance of being re-elected in the 2019 election.
I wouldn’t bet on it. I also wouldn’t bet on whichever ship of fools gets to run Canada in 2019 rolling back the auto update taxes. They will use it as a working model for moar tax, its all government can do. The precedent has been set Canadians are screwed.
Ireland already has a system whereby tobacco automatically has to increase above the rate of inflation.
Vindictive they may be, but at least those are proper ‘taxes’, they produce money for government which means the government doesn’t have to raise that cash elsewhere from other imposts.
Minimum alcohol pricing is simply a device which allows the suppliers to charge vastly more than it costs to produce and sell, with no benefit for anyone apart from the shareholders of the various brewers and distillers – plus, of course, anyone in the law-makers who’s partial to the odd appreciative ‘bung’.
You lost me at Vindictive. Don’t bother trying to explain. A tax is a tax. Other than governments I’m not aware of anyone that likes paying taxes of any kind.
Ever since they started on about this minimum pricing malarkey in Scotland, I’ve wondered why they’ve decided to increase prices this way instead of the tried-and-true “sin tax” policy, as applied to tobacco and, now, sugar. As Mudplugger says, the only people to benefit from this are the drinks suppliers, and it’s highly unusual for any Government, anywhere, to pass legislation which effectively causes price increases that doesn’t line their own pockets at the same time. So why the divergence in this instance? Any ideas anyone?