Comments

Trust me, it’s science — 11 Comments

  1. Do not confuse me with facts. I want to cling to my prejudices as taught by the self appointed elite and endorsed by the equally delusional media.
     
    I say more but I deleted myself yesterday.

  2. Dave – No problem.  I’ll peer review your study.  Please forwad copious quantities of Guinness and cigars.  And give my regards to RhodesteR next time you switch personalities.

    Jim C – All I can say is that I am glad you landed in the wastebin.  Recovery seems to have worked well?

    TT – Those branches of science that don’t involve epidemiological studies or whose results aren’t prearranged with their funders.  If I had been sold a little box and been told that it was a computer because some study said it was, then I might be a little skeptical.  Fortunately engineers have to rely on proven hard facts when designing computers, and those facts are determined by hard experimentation and rigorous testing.

    Cat – I have taken the same route myself.  In my book there is a 99% chance that “studies show” is going to lead to a load of bollox which I can safely ignore.

  3. Dave – Damn!  Sorry.  Your shrink told me not to mention your other personalities as it may disturb you.  Do you feel disturbed?

  4. Groandad, believe me a large part of the reason for the existence of such shite masquerading as science is the fact that politicians don’t do their job. If I were ever a minister I would email every organisation and ‘stakeholder’ the ministry had ever had any contact with on day one and warn them never to approach the ministry with a ‘survey’ extrapolated to the entire population, never to stray too far from the truth in order to make a case and never, ever, on pain of death to attempt to blackmail the ministry with emotive argumentation.
     
    A major cost to all western governments is the bizarre situation where some little shyte from some two-bit organisation set up by the indignant for the indignant can demand a meeting with a minister and open up the conversation by saying ‘minister do you believe children’s health should be protected?’
    You would not believe how much emotive blackmail is used with the threat of such a two-bit operation immediately running to the media if not placated or indulged with stories of how the minister ‘wants all your children to die’ because he or she hasn’t immediately said they’ll change the law. I wrote a part of a lobby paper some years back and had a jaw dropping moment when I read a later Act of Parliament and recognised some of the sentences I had constructed actually in the legislation. I’m one of the few people I suspect who has actually written part of the law without even realising I was doing it. The system whereby Ministers are actually placating every shyster with a story and an indignancy ends up with huge amounts of public time and money wasted. I can guarantee you that.
     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hosted by Curratech Blog Hosting