A while ago an item hit the news and was quickly forgotten.

The item announced that “After a week-long meeting of international experts, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which is part of the World Health Organization (WHO), today classified diesel engine exhaust as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), based on sufficient evidence that exposure is associated with an increased risk for lung cancer.”

Now in general I have little time for cancer studies as invariably they are slanted in favour of tobacco reduction.  However, this has nothing to do with smoking and there are no vested interests involved, so I would be more inclined to give it credence.

So here we have a gas which is a carcinogenic.  I quietly pondered to myself how much of this stuff is floating around.

I had a quick glance around the Interweb and found that at least one model of double-decker bus has an engine capacity of 9.3 litres.  For the sake of mental arithmetic, we’ll call that 9 litres.

Those of you who know a little about car mechanics will know that the 9 litres is the displacement of the engine, and that a diesel engine expels its exhaust every second upward stroke.  So a diesel engine running at say 1000 revolutions per minute will expel 9 x 1000 / 2 litres of exhaust.  In other words, every minute it will produce 4,500 litres. 

To put that in perspective, every minute a bus engine is running, it produces enough carcinogenic gas to fill a domestic central heating tank four and a half times over.

And that is just one bus.  What happens if we include all lorries, tractors and ordinary domestic cars?

So I would ask our Minister for Sickness, Fatso Reilly what he intends to do about this?  He is obviously concerned about cancer levels otherwise he wouldn’t be penalising smokers so heavily and trying to ban smoking in cars?  I would ask him how many cigarettes would have to be smoked to produce four and a half thousand litres of concentrated carcinogenic gas.  I would ask him if he uses a diesel car.  I would ask if he intends to immediately ban all diesel cars, buses, tractors and lorries off our roads.

And what about our friend Crown who is so concerned about a bit of cigarette smoke floating in front of a child?  Surely he must be galvanised into action or does it take the word of a seven year old to do that?

Here is a real example where the anti-smokers could shift their attention to something that would do some real good for the nation’s health.

Or maybe the anti-smoker industry has nothing to do with health after all?

It's only fair to share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponShare on Tumblr


Calling their bluff — 12 Comments

  1. Bio diesel might be the answer -has no soot, although it’s probably just a matter of time before ‘research’ discovers it raises your cholesterol or something!

  2. Not Green – But then aren’t there problems with turning so much agricultural land over to fuel crops?  What really amuses me is the deafening silence from all these so called cancer charities.  They are so obsessed with the cigarette that they can’t see anything as obvious as diesel fumes.

  3. Cancer charities would go out of business if cancer cures were more widely known. The UK cancer charities are charities in name only. Funded almost entirely or in ASH’s case ENTIRELY by the taxpayer these pretend lobby groups do the governments work by proxy.
    As for the diesel being cancerous don’t worry there will be another expert or three along in a minute waving a report that ‘proves’ the exact opposite. There is more junk science floating around this world than ever before and its purpose is to try and keep the ignorant scared enough to cough up without complaining. Seems to work rather well.

  4. tt – Third paragraph above.

    William – I have no doubt you are probably right.  It shall be proved that inhaling diesel fumes is essential for all human life, and breathing petrol fumes increases IQ by 500 points.  But cigarettes will always kill on the first puff.

  5. I would be more inclined to give credence to the report linked by Anne than most of the others carried out, any report funded by Govt (in reality the Tax payer whether we like it or not) or by the Pharmaceutical industry cannot be trusted as he who pays the piper calls the tune.

    Cannot ban diesel cars or busses as these ferry people to visit fatso Reilly’s mansion therefore allowing him draw extra money from the state.

    Maybe if you could develop the technology that would allow your smoke to be ferried away out of your car through the exhaust????      

  6. Lafsword – There is a very simple method of validating reports and studies.  Just ask two questions – A) Who funded the study and B) who stands to gain financially.  If Answer A = Answer B then the study should be consigned to the bin where it belongs. 

    As for blowing smoke out my ‘exhaust’…  that would be a damn good party trick!  😀

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hosted by Curratech Blog Hosting