Yet another new smoking
So now sitting is the new smoking!
This is a lovely little soundbite so beloved of “researchers” these days. I have lost count of the number of everyday items that are suddenly “the new smoking”.
It a catchy little snippet that is bound to catch the attention of the gutter press and the intellectually challenged bovine masses. Millennials are going to gasp in horror at the realisation that the act of sitting could halve their lifespan, cause an infinite number of cancers and cause all their cheeeldren to drop dead. Soon we’ll have second hand sitting [or passive sitting?] and demands for chairs furnished with olive green upholstery with pictures of enormous pustular arses on them.
The real reason for the “is the new smoking” tagline is slightly more subtle than that though. You see, the “researchers” are jealous. They see the Anti-Smokers getting vast wads of cash from their gubmints to spend on salaries and perks, while doing nothing more that demanding legislation of some sort. It’s the ultimate cushy number. The Irish Society of Chartered Physiotherapists look on the Anti-Smokers and wonder if they can jump onto the same gravy train, or even better, create a new gravy train.
The Anti-Smokers created a precedent. They proved that telling a lie often enough not only convinces the Ignorati that it’s the truth but that piling lie upon lie is easier once you’ve got the first lie accepted. They have proved that mass population control works  Not only that but they have proved that there is major money to be made by setting up a fake charity just so long as it has the word “tobacco” [preferably including “children”] in the title.
Now everyone wants in on the act. Anti-sugar, anti-alcohol, anti-fast food, anti-fat and now anti-sitting are all desperate to match the success of the Anti-Smokers and create their own little trough of public money.. It’s a racket, plain and simple.
Maybe I should set up a charity to get in on the act?
Action on Reducing Seating Environments?
ARSE for short?
Nothing new about it unfortunately. From 2014 (the oldest I could quickly find):Â Work at a desk? Then experts have worrying news… Why sitting down can be as bad for you as smoking
Maybe they reckon that the laughter has died down sufficiently for them to rehash the idea? When there is big gubmint money at stake, it’s worth a try?
Well, as I said, that’s the oldest I could find. It was dragged up again in July ’16.
They’ve done the same with eggs (Aug’12, April ’17): http://harridanic.com/wiki/(Almost)_As_Bad_As_Smoking
“chairs furnished with olive green upholstery with pictures of enormous pustular arses on them.”
We already have that in Britain. Â Although the seats in the House of Commons are green benches rather than individual chairs and the politicians are not pictures.
Dear Grandad
You missed out salt, as in Consensus Action on Salt and Health, or CASH for short (hmmm, wonder if that is significant?)
My local Marks and Sparks has various uplifting propaganda on its wall, including:
<i>”We are removing salt from our foods faster than you can say ‘sodium chloride'”</i>
I often wonder, as I descend the stairs, whether that is faster than you can say “hyponatraemia”.
Do you suppose Our Beloved Governments⢠are conducting experiments on chronic salt deprivation on their respective livestock?
Surely not, they couldn’t be that bad? Could they?
DP
PS Editing doesn’t allow one to remove HTML tags or wotever and use the ‘highlight and click’ option in the original comment box like this: example 1 or example 2 etc. Er, that’s example 3 …
But I guess you know that, being interweb savvy an’ all.
Just thought I’d mention it. Hope it helps. Um, thanks. DP
‘example 2’ should have been underlined.
Pah and thrice pah.
DP
Underline doesn’t work.
DP