This latest “blasphemy” farce has me annoyed, confused and highly amused all at the same time.
Annoyed, because the whole escapade is a farce, a waste of time and a waste of resources.
Confused, because according to this ridiculous law a person has to intentionally cause outrage among a substantial number of adherents of that religion. What the bind fuck does that mean? What is outrage? What is a substantial number? And when does a personal opinion become an intent to outrage?
Amused, because it is such a farce. A bloke comes onto a television programme which about personal beliefs and states his belief. Some cunt then decides two years later that he wasn’t offended, but some other people might be.
The only conclusion I can come to is that this anonymous personage “down the country” brought the case solely to show up our constitution and the law for the farce that it is; something I might add he has achieved in spectacular fashion.
I hope it goes to court.
I can’t wait to see if God appears as a witness.