Comments

Of time and tide — 4 Comments

  1. “Have they been using the same measuring equipment all this time?”

    As it happens – NO: http://notrickszone.com/2015/01/14/germanys-warming-happens-to-coincide-with-late-20th-century-implementation-of-digital-measurement/

    “The hottest year on record”

    By a miserable two hundredths of a degree Celsius: http://joannenova.com.au/2015/01/2014-noaa-nasa-produce-weakest-science-on-hottest-fantasy-in-modern-record/

    “An inexorable rise in sea levels does seem to indicate a danger”

    Not really: http://joannenova.com.au/2015/01/sea-level-rise-was-less-than-thought-skeptics-were-right/#more-40416

    • It doesn't matter how much science, logic or indeed proof you throw at them; anything that runs contrary to their religion is simply ignored.  They believe it therefore it must be true.

      Unless JoNova has hit on something – "But it does mean some people who want to seem-scientific want more of your money."?  Nah!  That couldn't be right.  Could it?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a target="" href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> <img src="" height="" width="" alt="" title=""> <table border="" style=""> <iframe frameborder="" allowfullscreen="" src="" width="" height=""> <div class=""> <tbody style=""> <tr style=""> <td style=""> <sub> <sup> <pre lang="" line=""> <ul style=""> <ol style=""> <li style=""> <span class="" style=""> <noindex>

Hosted by Curratech Blog Hosting
%d bloggers like this: