In which I agree with John Waters

John Waters has described sleepless nights, losing a stone in weight and how he is afraid to go into Dublin's city centre at night in the wake of the Pantigate controversy.

Don't ask me what this "pantigate" thing is all about.  I [and everyone else bar John Waters] has forgotten all about it.  I gather he made some homophobic comments on television?

In his first interview since the event, the controversial columnist also defended his €40,000 settlement with RTE – saying he believes he could have received €4m from the national broadcaster if the libel proceedings had gone to a full hearing.

"What is the great crime in taking money off the state broadcaster?" he asked, in an interview near his holiday home in Sligo town yesterday.

No crime at all if you are greedy enough to get your snout in the trough of taxpayers' money.

"Let me tell you this, if this had gone on, it isn't €40,000, I would have got €4m out of RTE."

Four million?  I suppose we can all dream?

Mr Waters also took the opportunity to reinforce his stance on gay marriage and adoption.

If you have inveigled your way into a newspaper you might as well use the opportunity.  Right?

"This is about free speech. It is about the rights of people to speak about what is important without being demonised," he said.

No it's not.  It's about a has-been hack trying to bolster his ego yet again.

Waters told the Sunday Independent he has been left fearing for his personal safety.

What?  Is there a baying mob outside the front door?  Are they burning a crucifix on the front lawn?  Or is this a weency bit of an exaggeration?

"I won't go in to Dublin city centre at night. When you have that kind of toxicity generated out of nothing, what are you going to do? It's not worth it."

Well, at least Dublin City centre is off the hook.  Any chance you can widen your no-go area?

"I was walking down the street and a guy on a bicycle shouted 'you f***ing homophobe' at me before cycling on. I was in a coffee shop on another occasion and a woman waddled over to me with a pram and told me I should be ashamed of myself before walking off. They are cowards, they shout something and keep walking, they don't want to engage.

Count your blessings.  At least some of your relations are still talking to you?

"I was frightened almost in a metaphysical way, that people could be so full of hatred. That, in accusing me of hatred, they could manifest a hatred infinitely greater than anything I could possibly imagine."

Oh for fuck's sake!  Get a fucking grip.  What the fuck is a "metaphysical fright" anyway?  Do you even know what the word means or do you use it because it looks impressive?

Asked if he had become depressed as a result of the national backlash, he said, "I don't believe in depression. There's no such thing. It's an invention. It's bullshit," he said, "it's a cop out."

Phew!  That's OK then.  No such thing as depression.  You'd better immediately get onto AWARE and all those tens [if not hundreds] of thousands of people who are under the delusion that they are depressed?  Mind you, for someone who is so scared of the mob you don't half like stirring the shit?  Whoops – the shit is stirred.

He also described how the backlash had taken a personal toll on his physical health: "I lost nearly a stone in the first few weeks of this. I didn't sleep."

Write a book about it.  There are thousands who would love to lose a stone or two.

Mr Waters said he gave serious consideration to quitting journalism and is still considering leaving Ireland to work elsewhere.

So there's still hope?

"I have no friends in the media anymore."

Aw Diddums! You still seem to get into the press though?

Describing the lowest point, he said it was the realisation that no one would speak out in his defence.

Maybe because you're indefencable?

"You have a certain hope that somebody, somewhere knows you for who you are, you kind of have some kind of naive hope that one of these people are going to stand up and say 'hang on, this is wrong, this is not this guy' and that moment never came."

But we do know you for what you are.  That's your problem.

In a passionate interview, Waters also defended previous statements he made on gay marriage and adoption which have landed him in hot water.

Questioning gay adoption, he drew parallels with two brothers taking paternal responsibility of a child.

"If two brothers who love each other in a particular way decide 'we would like to adopt a child' this society would regard that as an absurdity, they would laugh them out of court.

"Yet if two men who are involved in a sexual relationship go forward to adopt a child we are told now, that should be okay? I find that really hard to understand, intellectually. Why is it that it is okay but it is not okay for two brothers or two straight men? I think that's a legitimate point."

There is a world of difference between homosexuality and incest.  For someone who tries to come across as a well-read intellectual, you can be remarkably dim at times.

He went on to describe as 'satirical' the fight to introduce gay marriage, when the core of the traditional family unit remains so broken.

"There is something fundamentally wrong to go off then and to come up with a peripheral issue, which gay marriage is in my view, and to deal with that first, when the raw bloody core of our family law and our family life in this country . . . that is satire. It is a mockery of reality to actually deal with something so peripheral and marginal, when there is such a wound at the heart of our culture. So I make no apologies for calling it a satire. It is satirical."

So we can only handle one issue at a time?

He defended his use of the word 'buggery', questioning why anyone would take offence to the term.

"People are selectively finding things offensive to suit themselves. But what is so offensive about the word buggery? I mean it's a phenomenon, it's a word to describe a physical function. My definition is anal penetration by men. It is very clear what it means. It is a term to describe a physical function, end of story. Why is it offensive? If the act is not offensive to people, why should the word to describe it be offensive?"

And here finally, we come to a point of mutual agreement.  Buggery is just a word and people can choose for themselves whether to be offended by it.  Just as "egotistical", "self-obsessed" and "cunt" are just words.

Speaking about the international attention the controversy had attracted, he questioned the interference of high-profile figures from both and home and abroad.

The "International attention"?  Headlines in the Washington Post?  Guest appearances on Oprah?  Back page of the Sligo Tribune?

"I don't spend a lot of time thinking about Madonna but people should mind their own business. Just like Pat Rabbitte should mind his own business.

I don't spend any time thinking about Madonna.  Got a thing for her, have you?

"He chose to intervene in this at a critical moment on an entirely one-sided basis. He is the Minister for Communications, I was on the BAI (Broadcasting Authority of Ireland) for three years while he was minister, we are the authority, the people who form and implement policy. Not once in that time did that minister come to sit at our table to discuss anything with us. So I would suggest that he does his job rather than interfering in issues that had nothing to do with him."

Mr Waters said he feels as though he has been "tarred and feathered" and "put on trial" for his beliefs.

If you keep coming up with bullshit ideas and courting controversy then what do you expect?

"Enda Kenny used to be against gay marriage and now he is not. Not one journalist has asked him to explain the trajectory of his change of heart."

Because no one could be bothered asking a politician how his mind works.  It's murky territory

On his history of legal disputes and settlements he said each one: "went to the very core of my being and my spirit."

Then stop wasting the courts' time with your petty whinging.

Egotistical self-obsessed cunt.

It's only fair to share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponShare on Tumblr


In which I agree with John Waters — 5 Comments

  1.  I started casually following John Waters many moons ago when Twentymajor first called him a cunt.
    He really has an innate quality of being on the wrong side of any arguement.  I can't think of a single time I ever read something of his and agreed with it.  I'm also left with the impression that most people feel the same way I do.  So my question becomes why is he given a platform by the media to espouse his stupidity?

    • The poor chap sees himself as being a frightfully intelligent, insightful genius, with an ego to rival Everest.  In practice he's just an ordinary hack with a great talent for putting his foot in it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *