Reductio ad absurdum
There is a new law coming into force here in ‘Ol’ Ireland.
The Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill 2022
From what I can gather it is aimed at discriminatory comments against various sections of society, including “protected characteristics” like race, colour, nationality, religion, ethnic or national origin, sexual orientation, gender or disability. I’m not quite sure what “protected characteristics” are but what the hell..
On the face of it this bill has a nice touchy feely ring to it. It is oozing political correctness and how could any right thinking Christian object to it?
Now apparently the law goes a bit deeper than just arresting leaders of anti-Semitic or anti-Immigrant groups which most will assume to be the case. By all accounts it includes the crime of even thinking discriminatory thoughts, or having in my private possession “offensive” material. If I had a copy of Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” for my own personal amusement this is sufficient proof that I am a closet Nazi just biding my time before doing something heinous. Come to think f it, I just Googled “Mein Kampf” to just confirm the spelling of it so I have probably committed a crime already..
Where the concern really comes to the fore however is that in practice the law reverses the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. I would now have to prove to a court that I was doing a spell check rather than having aspirations for forming a Fourth Reich. The law states [or so I believe] that posession of any material that is discriminatory is a crime even if it isn’t published. It’s considered an intent rather than an action. That completely fucks me up when they find all the old posts here that I didn’t actually publish.
But where does it end? How many things are there in The Manor that could be proof of a thought to commit a crime? What about my block of kitchen knives? Are they proof that I have considered or intend to consider a murder of a Black? Would I have to stand in the dock and prove that I use them for cutting onions and tomatoes and not transsexuals?
The one thing that does cheer me though is that apparently I am now a member of The Far Right who, I hear, are the root cause of all the world’s problems. My membership qualification is that I object to their new law as a serious erosion of freedom of speech.
It’s nice to know my place.
Grandad,
Control, control, control.
Here’s another for thought – while thought is still allowed.
You know that green MP we have? Caroline Lucas? Well, she says that there must be no debate and no questioning of the climate change narrative. She also thinks that a differing opinion expressed in the media is grounds for state intervention.
You’ll enjoy{?} the video tonight…
I remind myself every once in a while, that I am at the age where I can look forward to my escape from the express train to Crazy Town. In the meantime; piss be upon them.
So that is Irish comedy dead then.
The grand thing about it is that it insults, mocks, everyone regardless. Mainly the Oirish race itself. If it is a race?
It all sounds like a lawyers wet dream.
Anything you own, say, do or even think will offend somebody. So the lawyers can pounce.
Got a shillelagh? Are you mocking the Irish? Are you plotting murder? A revolution? An anti green campaigner.
Only very expensive court cases will be able to resolve these tricky legal conundrums. Conumdri?
Your old Latin master will be spinning in his grave, the standard plural for a word ending in ‘um’ would be ‘a’, hence conundra. Write out 100 times, Amo, Amas, Amat, Amamus, Amatis, Amant.
How about “Whacko whackere waili sorebum” as a starter?
Oh yus, I know my Latin, but Dooners may well be correct with his statement as an implicit secondary minor gerundive with irregularities in the third declension would be assimilated into the hugely popular “Dic had a duc with fer on its fac”…
Have an ablative and tonic on me…
Interesting:
GD’s post is about what is a kind of “enabling act” which means the Dear Government can now bang up inconvenient voices who say the wrong things (“wrong” as defined by the Dear Government). Not only that, but the perp will be guilty unless they can prove their innocence. The punishment is the process, and available *now* against GD and anyone else here who comes to the attention of any activist of âprotected characteristicsâ who wants to be offended and victimized by same.
And these comments are about Irish Comedy & Latin…