Comments

A question — 8 Comments

  1. Been there done that many times.  Always thought it was just me moaning but if an expert like you find it a pain I feel better.

    Why can't the pillocks leave things alone. Some update or another has fucked my drop down bookmarks menu. It used to be single spaced. I have a hell of a lot of bookmarks –I think.  I don't know what would be seen as "normal". I could find what I was after mainly by the shape of the list not by reading every line. Just memory. Now it is double spaced. I've nearly worn out the scroll wheel on my mouse.  It is a simple unimportant thing in the scheme of things but it is a pain in the arse. It slows me down it disturbs my routine and I'm bloody sure there is no reason for it or benefit to Firefox or whatever.

    Reading comments and questions on Google seems to me it cannot be returned to single spaced.  Various suggestions are posted but with my total ignorance of computing there is absolutely no chance I will even try, and risk disaster. And none seem to work anyway..

    Why is it so difficult for them? Once it was single space now it isn't–so something changed–  what? why?–just give me the option to say sod off I don't want it and change back. Of all the arrogant imposed "improvements" over the years this one has really pissed me off.

    I feel a bit better now. Thanks.

    • You don't mention which browser you use, but I used to have a lot of trouble with Firefox and their updates.  The crunch came when they redid all their coding and screwed up everything, including making half my add-ons redundant.  I switched to Waterfox and have never looked back.  They do the odd update [including one last night] but it looks exactly as I want all the time.

      I use tons of bookmarks, and like yourself, I rely a lot on the familiarity of their positions.  You have my sympathies!

  2. In my rather extensive experience with Windows (since version 3.0. Loved those Norton Tools!), Windows has never learned to count. It started out ignorant in that area when it first arrived and has remained so ever since. The closest Windows ever came to counting accurately was, "About…".

    As far as restarting once or more during the update I've come to the conclusion that any update that has to do with the kernel in the slightest–Windows panics. It couldn't possibly handle anything like that in the background while it was running. Could it be that even the latest version of Windows is still using that ancient NT kernel?

    And downloading the update(s), installing and restarting is only half of it. After that's done then comes the after-updates cleaning. For me it means running the built in disc tools for the Windows drive in order to clean all the crap leftover from applying the updates, running good ol' CCleaner and finally defragging (not using the built in piece of junk) in the case of a hard drive.

    I know this doesn't answer your question and I've asked the same myself numerous times. I don't think there's an answer except possibly…Because it's Microsoft?

    • I used to love Norton Defragment [or whatever it was called].  If ever a punter in RTE pissed me off, I would "defragment" their hard drive and tell 'em they couldn't use the PC until it was finished.  They would end up just staring at those little blobs flicking around the screen.

      The only time Linux suggests a reboot is after a kernel update, and even then it's just a suggestion and won't involve any additional time at all.

      Of course another aspect of Linux is that the update system involves every programme you have installed.  So you don't fire up a programme only to find an irritating message demanding an update [and acceptance of terms and conditions and all that crap]

  3. And don't forget the occasions when it does all that then Windoze refuses to restart, eventually Windoze decides to uninstall the failed updates, which can take much longer than the installation and leaves behind all the crap and changed settings everywhere.

    • It is scary that the majority of businesses rely on Windoze.  It must cost the world billions in lost productivity?

      • It's roots are back in the early '80s, in the days when "No-one was ever fired for buying IBM" was virtually axiomatic. Once the PC/MS-DOS systems (pretty crappy, even then) became pervasive, the rest – and the future – became history. 

        Microsoft, having achieved almost hegemony, stopped caring. Or bothering.

  4. Well this is timely. I was catching up on the comments and just noticed a prompt that my device needs to restart in order to finish installing recent updates. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a target="" href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> <img src="" height="" width="" alt="" title=""> <table border="" style=""> <iframe frameborder="" allowfullscreen="" src="" width="" height=""> <div class=""> <tbody style=""> <tr style=""> <td style=""> <sub> <sup> <pre lang="" line=""> <ul style=""> <ol style=""> <li style=""> <span class="" style=""> <noindex>

Hosted by Curratech Blog Hosting
%d bloggers like this: