Comments

… or believe it not — 11 Comments

  1. "Christianity was a philosophy of peace and love, where the Catholic Church was a man-made institution more interested in self-serving wealth and control of the people."

    The Catholic church is not alone in this: virtually all organised religions/churches are tarred with the same brush.

     

    • I am kind of attached to the concept myself.  I would be nice to think that wrongdoers [and good-doers?] get their just deserts, I'm afraid it is more in the realm of wishful thinking.

  2. According to the Christian religion, I was made in God's image. I can therefore say with a large degree of certainty that if He (i.e. the Christian God) exists then the last thing he wants is to listen to people telling Him how great He is and singing songs extolling His virtues. It might be fun for five minutes or so but an eternity…

    • That thought often crossed my mind too.  All this prayer and adoration could only be fit for a deity with an ego greater than all creation.

  3. It's weird isn't it?

    I had thought to comment on yesterdays blog, but time slipped by…

    I was brought up in an Anglican tradition, and suffered long walks to church on a Sunday in our charcoal black suits and back, in hot sun, as boarders in the first couple of years of High School.

    Only after lunch could we strip off and go to the swimming pool, at least in summer.

    But even before that, my Dad had worked his way up the hierarchy to become a vicar.

    Not bad, for someone who left school early, yet later went to theological college, learned old greek.

    Very practical as well, he had built boats, household furniture, even later a large reflector telescope.

    But on leaving high school, for me the '70's beckoned, and beyond introductions to hash and LSD, going to art school, having already won prizes for painting, there were books, Timothy Leary & Baba Ram Dass & a whole bunch of Eastern mysticism, etc. Also The Whole Earth Catalogue. Music, of course.

    Well, I got beyond all that. But it still remains part of my history.

    Many years later I did attend a Buddhist Vipassana  course, and found it profoundly illuminating.

    Hmm, maybe revealing is better. The best examination and discovery of oneself imaginable.

    No, even that's not enough. Like the best school lesson you did best in, magnified to your full self.

    Still, I didn't keep up the practice, practise, as a piano player might or should;- I let it lapse.

    On the other hand, I still keep up awareness of my breathing, which is where it starts.

    Simple stuff.  On the other hand, I still enjoy taking tobacco! And alcohol.

    I don't describe it well. But it was a profound experience. Way more so than any LSD trip had been.

    (Which I'd given up years ago – you only needed one, or just another maybe to make sure … ? )

    But really, I'm glad I did try it, but have felt no need to have had it again, for decades since.

     

    But back to Roman Catholic considerations.

    It really is a different construct. Women were downplayed in the Bible? Roman oppressors?

    There have been so many mis-translations over the years. What or who can you trust?

    Although the original historian author has died, and his web page seeming too, these pages are preserved quite beautifully here … I suggest start reading from the 3rd paragraph here, and then next pages.

    http://www.karenlyster.com/body_bookish2.html

    "Let us now move to where the Christian story began – to the Gospels themselves. And, in doing this, let us first consider what the Gospels actually tell us, against what we perhaps think they tell us."

    There really are some remarkable revelations in the next few paragraphs and pages.

    The time differences. Translation misunderstandings.

    We can talk about Angel Investors here now, but dialogue and dialect from 2000 years ago?

    I think it's worth reading through.

    Cheers! ;=})

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • Worth reading indeed!  I have just had a read and it is fascinating stuff.  I have heard accounts before of missing gospels and poor interpretations and translations so it doesn't contain any real surprises.  There have been many interpretations and I remember seeing a very interesting one a few years ago [BBC?  Horizon?] that proposed the theory that Jesus had in fact been adopted by Tibetan Monks at an early age before returning home [explaining a large gap in history according to the gospels] and that after the crucifixion he returned to Tibet to live out the rest of his life.  They gave quite a few proofs of this, but I would still be inclined to take it as food for thought more than "gospel" truth.

       

  4. For other religions I work on the principle "if it makes them happy" and so long as they leave me and mine in peace I'm happy to live and let live.

    Although I do occasionally have fun teasing the doorknockers with inconvenient facts.

    Which is one of the drawbacks of these pandemic restrictions, the evangelists all have to stay home.

    • I thought their mythical Sky Pixie was supposed to protect them from everything, especially while they're out selling his product to the hard-of-thinking . . . . . .

  5. It's a bit like the difference between Columba and his Irish bretheren and the Roman Church hierarchy. Says it all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a target="" href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> <img src="" height="" width="" alt="" title=""> <table border="" style=""> <iframe frameborder="" allowfullscreen="" src="" width="" height=""> <div class=""> <tbody style=""> <tr style=""> <td style=""> <sub> <sup> <pre lang="" line=""> <ul style=""> <ol style=""> <li style=""> <span class="" style=""> <noindex>

Hosted by Curratech Blog Hosting
%d bloggers like this: