Time for a good excuse
The AstraZeneca vaccination is perfectly safe.
But it’s not.
But don’t worry. Give us a couple of days and we’ll make it safe again.
We can’t change it because it is already packed and shipped, but we’ll come up with some reason that will reassure everyone, and will resume vaccinations.
“An analysis of our safety data that covers reported cases from more than 17 million doses of vaccine administered has shown no evidence of an increased risk of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis or thrombocytopenia with Covid-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca.
“In fact, the reported numbers of these types of events for Covid-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca are not greater than the number that would have occurred naturally in the unvaccinated population.
“In clinical trials, no trends or patterns were observed with regard to pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, or events possibly related to thrombocytopenia.
RTE News
In other words, they reckon the vaccine is perfectly safe. So why halt the process?
Why do I get the feeling that the reason for the temporary halt is to give them time to think up some excuse to reassure everyone? Some way to bury the bodies, as it were? They know they can’t stop at this stage so it is inevitable that they will resume.
It’s funny how their reassurances have the exact opposite effect on my confidence?
You wonder sometimes if we've slipped into a time warp, with a renewed Mengele and Goebbels in their element rejoicing at the new facilities and technology they have to play with and an eager cult like following in awe of their omnipotence.
Whatever happens these charlatans have got a ready excuse for it, with legions of our fellows clinging to their every utterence as if were the Gospel, all thats missing is the piper and cliffs.
Speaking of which, yesterday i mentioned in your last post that i hadn't any face to face animosity, all change, just been shopping and yes was the only bod without a mask, when i came out with loaded trolley bumped into a now 84 year old i used to work with some 40 years ago, he's not masking because he's struggling with his breathing as it is and assumed here was a fellow dissident, then told me proudly he was one of the first in the county to have both jabs, volunteered too around Christmas time, asked me about my jab and when i told him i wasn't having it he visibly recoiled as if confronted by the creature from the black lagoon (can i say that?), then announced that i should be forced to have it because i could kill millions, doubt he'll speak to me again.
No sooner had the ink dried on my ramble when…..
No indication AstraZeneca vaccine caused blood clots, says EMA director.
So why stop it?
"the creature from the black lagoon" – Of course you can say it: you just did. It's hardly "the creature from the African-American lagoon"?
I was in the supermarket today. Five or six customers. One wearing a mask. He was getting funny looks. Is the tide turning?
I'm generally the only non masked person on the very few occasions I've had to go shopping. However, I've noticed that quite a few bus drivers are no longer wearing them – and many don't even appear to have one dangling under their chin. Considering that passengers are rarer than rocking horse shit, I guess that no complaints have been forthcoming…
Italy confessed it was a political move. Said there was internal pressure to go with the flow. Nothing would surprise me about the EU Commissioners and the other bigwigs. Meanwhile people are catching the virus and dying.
The EU Commissioners don't give a toss about people dying, they only care about protecting, preserving and expanding their sinister 'project' – the very same focus which meant they took their eye off the ball 12 months ago and fell into the festering pile of cheval-merde they currently occupy. Couldn't happen to a more suitable bunch.
Hopefully the brighter EU citizens may now finally wake up, smell all the horse-shit and get out of that corrupt stable – the fresh air of freedom is sweet.
Why do so many countries in the world seem dead keen to spend 4 or 5 times more for vaccines when compared with the AZ one?
What could possibly be the reason? Are the non-AZ vaccines 4 or 5 times better? Are they easier to transport and store? Is there really that much hatred for the UK? Just think 30 cases from 17,000,000 jabs. Shocking!
I smell a bladder-less rodent.
All previous vaccines have been given after long-term testing and, significantly, when the recipient has no infection. Vaccinating during an epidemic (with some recipients, possibly infected already but unaware of it, has never before been thought sensible or safe.
Now we are expected to accept a novel concoction (which is not a normal vaccine as understood by medics), during an epidemic, whether already infected or not.
I'm quite surprised by the very low number of adverse reactions so far. Perhaps in a few weeks we'll have more data about clotting and other side-effects. I hope not, but suspect there could be many more problems ahead.
This is pretty silly. By all normal standards for vaccines the AV one is clearly safe. There have been millions of vaccinations. in the UK without serious levels of side effects.. Ditto for Israel. As far as I can see the only reason for suspending use of the vacine is because of the alarmist stuff which would appear if they didn't. Jus kike MMR Plus a bit of vengeance on AZ of course,.
Knowing of unofficial reports of deaths of people who had not long before had the Pfizer or Modena drug, my first unworthy thought on hearing of the official reports of AZ drug problems was "They have a huge stock of the expensive drugs that are not shifting because a lot of punters are refusing them. So lets up the fear factor on the more acceptable one."
And anyway it originated in dispicable, smug, UK.