An unfunny joke
There was a ring on the doorbell the other evening.
This was unusual as everyone comes around to the back door with the exception of the meter reader and the postman, and they never call around in the evening. Out of curiosity I went to see who it was.
It was a bloke canvassing for his missus in the forthcoming elections.
Now I don’t know of any elections, forthcoming or otherwise so I let him go on his way and thought no more about it.
Last night I noticed a few advertisements from our illustrious Gubmint begging us to check the electoral register to make sure we are entitled to vote. I’m beginning to detect the distinct stench of an election in the offing.
Now I have no intention of voting. I haven’t done so in years for two simple reasons.
The first is that there is no point in voting for any of the major parties as they are all precisely the same. And anyway as soon as they are elected they swan off, ignoring all the election promises and proceeding to do all sorts of things I never would have voted for. If a candidate does stand with whom I agree entirely, he [or she] would just be a lone voice in the ordure which achieves nothing.
The second reason is that I think the entire system is wrong. They get elected and promptly elevate themselves out of reach of the Pleb in the street. They set their own terms and conditions. They pay themselves way too much in salary and pension. They set holidays and trips abroad [just look at the Paddy’s Day round of trips to exotic locations!] all at the expense of the taxpayer.
People say I have to vote, that every vote is important. They say that if I don’t vote then I am not entitled to complain. That is bollox. My abstinence is a vote in itself. In my view, voting for any of them whether I like the candidate or not is contributing to their system and is a tacit agreement with the system itself. The whole system is frankly a joke.
They have it right in the Ukraine!
Every spoilt ballot counts more than a ballot not made…
Which is exactly what I sent in for our local elections last week.
If there is an election and if I happen to be near the polling station I might do that. I had better start practising my drawing of a phallus?
Phallus not mandatory, but merely only one of the recommended alternatives to the simple X.
On mine I had sufficient space to write 'None of the above' between the name of the four candidates (Con, Lab, Lib, Green) and the series of boxes (tick only one )for my 'approval' of one of said candidates, all 4 of which I scribbled through.
My point being, spoilt votes are actually counted (in UK at least) and are available as part of the official count. They simply aren't that public.
Not submitting a (spoilt) vote could be, and is, rendered as lethargy, or as contempt upon the system, or indicision. Or any number of 'we needn't concern ourselves with the silent majority. '
A spoilt vote is demonstrably contempt. And recorded seperately.
Absolutely right.
A couple of years ago in a local election, I defaced my ballot-paper with a single word – a week later, writing in the local paper, one of the candidates made specific reference to my defacing comment. By that act, my 'spoilt' paper had far more impact than any correctly-completed one (and certainly more than any abstention, whether lazy or deliberate).
It's sad that we have to do it but, until our political classes start listening, we've got to shout by whatever methods we can, so get out there and make your mark, an X or otherwise.
It might not apply in Ireland, but in England your ballot paper is fully traceable to you. So spoil it, but try to avoid anything too offensive.
Grandad for Taoiseach. That would show them.
Many years ago I was involved in doing the count for local elections. I don't remember the spoilt papers being counted at all – they were just put in a pile.
From my experience of election counts, at the end of the count all the 'spoilt papers' are examined together by representatives of each of the candidates and the Returning Officer, at which point they agree which ones are acceptably clear in voting intention despite being 'spoilt' and which ones are so unclear (in terms of specifying a candidate) that they are rejected. The agreed ones are added to the count, the rejected ones are reported as 'spoilt papers'.
That is the process by which 'creative spoiling' can have its effect.
Via https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/election_data_spoilt_votes
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/34887/response/90206/attach/html/2/Paul%20J%20Herring%2025248.pdf.html