The Unacceptable Asterisk
“Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never harm me“.
I was taught that little mantra in my early years and I have stood by it ever since. I have been called many names in my time, some of which may indeed have been classed as racist, or at the very least a slur on my nationality. The only time I ever had concern for my safety was when I was picked on by bunch of drunken Unionists in Belfast during a politically sensitive period, but that’s a different story.
So what are words? They are merely vibrations in the air or a combination of letters on the printed page. The words in this brainfart use letters that are repeated many billions of times every day across the world and the only significance is the number and order of those letters, the context of the preceding words and the interpretation that the reader may put on them. In themselves, words are harmless, unless of course they are deliberately used to incite violence in the mind of the reader.
I read a wee item today about Princeton University. A row has apparently broken out over a professor using – as the item has it – “the N word”. Princeton itself prefers to use the term “n****r”. Now is there anyone in this class who is not aware by now that the word is “nigger”? I guarantee that there isn’t. Mind you it could have been “nutter” but we all know what we are talking about. In either case it is a case of gross hypocrisy to try to obscure a word when the intended meaning of the word is perfectly obvious.
The wonderful irony in the Princeton case is that the bold Professor Rosen was teaching a class on “cultural freedoms and hate speech”. What the fuck did the students expect? Can you give a cookery class without mentioning any ingredients? Can you teach a child about sex without mentioning genitalia? But these pathetic little snowflakes have to complain because the word “nigger” was used, not once but three times! Wow!
The school said it will continue “to look for ways to encourage discussions about free speech and inclusivity with the students in Professor Rosen’s class and the campus community more broadly”.
What is this fucking inclusivity shit? Even my smell checker doesn’t know what it means! It’s just one of those little snowflake words that the little darlings can hug to their chests and bandy about as if it means something vital to life itself.
Speaking on Monday night at a town hall meeting with students that had been scheduled before the controversy erupted, university president Christopher Eisgruber said he respected Rosen’s decision to use the word, citing the importance of having conversations where people feel “uncomfortable”.
He is spot on. Fuck “uncomfortable”! Anyone who feels uncomfortable with a word needs a massive dose of reality. In fact anyone who talks about being uncomfortable, unacceptable or inclusivity should be marched straight off to be drafted into the army. That’ll teach the little darlings what uncomfortable really means.
Carolyn Rouse, chairwoman of Princeton’s Anthropology Department, who is black, wrote a letter to the editor of the The Daily Princetonian defending Rosen’s use of the slur. She wrote that by the end of the semester, Rosen hoped his students would be able to argue why hate speech should or should not be protected using an argument other than “because it made me feel bad”.
It made them feel bad? Oh the precious little diddums! Run back to mammy before the Big Bad World gets you.
Let’s examine another word.
Contempt.
‘Black’. Should that not have been ‘b***k’?
No it f***ing shouldn’t. An asterisk has generally two functions in life – as a sign of a footnote and as a multiplication in computer coding. Anyone who uses it as a substitute for a letter is a f***ing sanctimonious hypocritical c**t.
Then f**k off you grouchy old f**t.
Fair enough.
Should not that be ‘f**r enough?
Nah. The asterisk is only used when the true spelling is blatantly obvious.
I now refer to it as, “the nigger word”, just to avoid any confusion.
Perfect. Elegant, unambiguous and politically correct. I now feel safe and unthreatened.
Your spellchecker seems surprisingly lacking. My Mac (designed by California snowflakes) allows me to select a word and look it up in the computers dictionary.
The result?
nigger | ˈnɪɡə | noun offensive a contemptuous term for a black or dark-skinned person.
ORIGIN late 16th century: from earlier neger,after Latin niger ‘black’ (see Negro).
USAGE The word nigger has been used as a strongly negative term of contempt for a black person since at least the 18th century. Today it remains one of the most racially offensive words in the language. Also referred to as ‘the n-word,’ nigger is sometimes used by black people in reference to other black people in a neutral manner (in somewhat the same way that queer has been adopted by some gay and lesbian people as a term of self-reference, acceptable only when used by those within the community).
Surprisingly neutral from software produced in California.
There are many words that are considered “racially offensive”. It amuses me how [as your smell checker points out] that the word “nigger” is frequently used by
blacksAfricansPeople of Equatorial Descent themselves. How can it be racially offensive if they use it? Are they not offended by their own use of the word?Personally I don’t use such terms except [as in the case of the good Professor above] to make a point. It does really amuse me though that if a word is used by an “outsider” the offended are quick to call the race card yet if they use it, it’s fine. We have the same problem here in Ireland with
TinkersKnackersPikeysTravellers!