Health services breaking the law
Over 300 retailers targeted in sting operations to see if they’re selling cigarettes to under 18s.
Hmmmm…..
There are a couple of interesting points here.
Let’s examine the basis for this operation. It is illegal to sell cigarettes to someone under the age of 18, so presumably they used under-18s in their little game? There are two points to note here – illegal means against the law, and anyone under 18 is considered in law to be a child.
So for starters, what is the Health Service Executive doing policing the law? Surely policing the law is the job of the … er … police? If the HSE suspects that the law is being broken then it’s its responsibility to inform the proper authority, not go out and provoke the breaking of the law in the first place. I would argue that sending minors into a situation to provoke an illegal act is in itself an illegal act – an accessory before the fact as it were.
Then there are the children involved, for in the eye of the law they are indeed children if they are under 18. What age were they precisely? Were they 5 or 10 years of age? My betting is that they were 17 and quite a few months, probably dressed up to look older. And what were the terms of their employment? Were they paid to do this or were they scammed into doing it “for the good of society”? Children are being used by a government agency to provoke lawbreaking? Whichever way I look at it I would rate it as morally and ethically wrong, and tantamount to child abuse.
I didn’t even know there was a “HSE Tobacco Control Inspection Programme”. What the fuck is their purpose? Are they there primarily to inspect law enforcement, which is none of their fucking business. Are these the Stasi of Tobacco Control?
There people really are evil.
“One case in 2016 resulted in Tesco Ireland having to donate â¬1,000 to a court poor-box to avoid a three-day ban on selling tobacco products after a 17-year-old test purchaser managed to buy a pack of cigarettes.”
(Ab)Using 17-year-olds is indeed more than questionable.
How are these youths recruited?
“The 12 week programme is a free and offers free nicotine replacement therapy,”
Who pays for the NRT?
In answer to your first question – I would like to know that myself!
Second question – the tax payer naturally. All the HSE including their SS wing are centrally funded out of taxes.
Big P having a field day then.
Grandad,
You’ve got a problem with that? Man, that’s so, like, yesterday. Wait ’till your lot catch up with our lot;
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5292597/Durham-children-used-mini-police-new-project.html
Heh! I saw that this morning. If you want to gain control, start with the kids.
âHSE Tobacco Control Inspection Programmeâ.
I expect it is part of the alibi to bring in Smoking Licences. Something MUST be done to stop all these evil shop keepers flouting the law and selling a deadly POISON to wee Kiddy-winkies..
With any luck , one of those 17 3/4 year olds will at age 18 start to smoke and then sue the HSE for getting him interested in cigarettes in the first place.
Now that would be poetic justice on a grand scale! The only problem is that damages would again come out of taxes. There again it wouldn’t make that much difference as the HSE is regularly [seems to be on a weekly basis] paying out millions in damages to the parents of all the kids they’ve killed or seriously damaged.
Using persons under the ‘legal’ age to purchase tobacco is making those persons into agents provocateurs. This is illegal. They are the ones urging that a crime be committed. Such evidence is not permitted in any Court.
I’ve seen job adverts for 18-19 year old Quislings to perform the same evil acts but that’s related to the Challenge 25 nonsense.
http://www.challenge25.co.uk/testing.html
All armed with body cameras and audio recording, lest any miscarriages of justice occur, no doubt.