A few weeks ago, there was a minor spat on this site where I was accused of being sexist.
While some of the lads in the village prefer sheep, I prefer women, so this accusation hurt me just a little.
One of the points the accusers made was that I had a photograph of a nice cleavage at the top of the site, and this was to somehow prove that I see women as sex objects. This baffled me a little, as I don’t see pints of Guinness, pills or my pipe as sex objects, so why should a drop of cleavage fall into that category? The woman in case [and no, it’s not Sharon, or Herself] wore that dress in public, and therefore one must assume she was happy at the thought of people having a little peek? It’s not as if I used that photograph of the next door neighbour’s wife doing very interesting things with a bar of soap in the bath?
I would suggest that any woman who is offended by my little image, should move to Iran where they will be much happier with the dress code there.
And talking of Iran and tits and things, there is an interesting theory doing the rounds. Apparently President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has it on good authority that the spate of earthquakes the world has recently experienced is caused by women wearing short dresses. This is quite an interesting hypothesis. I have certainly heard of short dresses causing car accidents, but not earthquakes.
Our K8 wrote about a very interesting experiment. Apparently, all women are to display as much of their cleavage as possible next Monday to see if it causes an earthquake. K8 seems a little dubious about it all, but I think it has its merits, purely in the interest of scientific research of course. In fact, I shall be out on Monday with my notebook and camera to monitor the experiment.
Come to think of it, I was watching Sharon read the news last night.
I think the earth did move a little.